Видео

Lol yeah

Excellent Analysis, Deployed Worldwide Through My Deep Learning AI Research Library. Thank You

I’m part of some weird darpa program. It’s annoying . I need a lawyer . Hollywood is a piece of shit

Josef Mangele basically became DARPA its a huge liability to US govt ..

The jews.

its 2024, is it better? I am not a robot.

Part three AS FAR AND IN REGARDS TO IT, ALL OF IT, WHATEVER ALL OR IT IS WITHIN EXISTENCE, A QUESTION FORMAT STRUCTURE IS USED ONLY TO FIND OUT THAT WHICH CAN NEVER BE KNOWN MEANING IN VERY PRACTICAL TERMS ABSOLUTE NOTHING. THIS IS THE VERY STRUCTURE OF A QUESTION AND IT'S ULTIMATE BEST USE OF. ANY OTHER POSSIBLE USES ARE AND IS TO BE CONSIDERED A LOW, VERY LOW, ALL THE WAY TO EXTREMELY LOW LEVEL OF LOGIC. With one having been equipped with freedom as a fundamental to existence, a civilisation structure to back it in a standing, and a categorical refusal in applying capital punishment in general terms, whereas one having been equipped with freedom as relative to existence, a barbaric structure to back it in a standing, and a persisting instance in applying capital punishment in general terms as must... Then it goes without saying, one will always find vengeance as a necessary must, to be undertaken . Whereas one will always find vengeance as a necessary must, to be gotten rid of. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. In truly and to the literales serious fallowing of that, one will invoke, evoke, free, set free, tell, constrict, describe, explain, show, call, marry one thousand of if necessary, banish, convert, change etc etc the most extensive and most complex of structures known as demons and angels there is or can be. Whereas one will kill, and exterminate, torture, imprison etc etc all one is able and capable to, preferably all, leaving one with only one's last standing, until the next campaign. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. At such points one will reach the highest levels of intelligence simply by successfully calling any intelligent person stupid. Whereas one will reach the highest levels of intelligence simply by successfully calling any stupid person intelligent. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. Which clearly makes one civilisation and one barbarism on equal incouncilable magnificent terms. Bringing both parts at a highly contestable and vigorous dispute as to what is to be considered the fundamental of privacy. One considers a, or any enclosed space limited in access, the fundamentals of privacy. Whereas one considers walking at its most useful and general aplicabilities, the fundamentals of privacy. And as always with either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. Which clearly makes one civilisation and one barbarism on equal incouncilable magnificent terms. The difference then turns stark, sharp and strenuous in regards to how one and the other considers forgiveness, showing how extremely different can the same exact thing be. One knows forgiveness to be equally in form and independence on and within the themselves as a point (a), and any other correlating corresponding point (b), a point which by being independent of the other, can only be activated within the spectrum, meaning the system it belongs to, maintaining always a correlating corresponding independence equaled. Whereas the other knows forgiveness only as the part being independent within themselves, giving one a meaning of possession which can be offered and received. As consequence awarding it as and an independence. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. Which at such point the barbaric structure and that of civilisation one are equally powerful and totally different. Only under such a structure and level of structure can a very important difference be born in regards to either structure part, the barbaric one or the civilisation one, and this difference regards to suffering. One will in many cases if not all, under the rightly weight circumstances present one's suffering in all of its considered possible forms as a hospitality form of being or even technique. Whereas one unless, required through costume, tradition, ritual, or faith and religion, will only present one's suffering in all of it's considered possible forms under a similar way of rightly weight circumstances, as means and only means to a learning how not to suffer, in fact how to surpass it. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. It is at this point where the difference turns into a violence defendable if and when contested even as a simple argument, at minimum a anger filled animosity, as a present and a past or future memory, to be and be used upon. In being that both parts claim and by claiming consider the same structure as themselves..... Then one will always proceed in colonising only and only that which is not civilisational in structure. Meaning the very definition of the concept colony. Whereas one will always proceed in colonising everything including that which is already a civilisational in structure. Meaning no connection to the meaning of a colony. Which at the most probable definite, makes one civilisation, and one barbarism. In being on top hierarchically as an ascending and descending order or level at a given stance... One will only consider a question, any question in a direct corresponding corrolation to another question always. Whereas one will only consider a question, any question in a direct corresponding corrolation to a physical, understood, known as understood, sensed, or assumed as sensed being, always. Making one very prone to reality based illusions, whereas the other very prone to reality based hallucinations. (One requires a perpetual orbit, one requires a perpetual forward movement.) With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. In the form of a magnificent civilization and a magnificent barbarism. In being things can achieve such levels of heat at any possible combinations of physical states..... Then, one will get addicted to the other at possibly uncontrollable level's. Whereas as the other will blame and destroy the other as the fault and source of such possible depravity addictions. Impending in the process it's, and it's existence. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. In being that a question is to be considered low, very low all the way to extremely low level of logic.... both structures can and always begin through.... One considering a bridge only and only in terms of it existing or not. Whereas the other considering a bridge only and only in terms of passage or not. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. Making highly distinctive in one being civilisation and one being barbarism. Precisely because of that form and state of being... One considers intention a set of actions, not to be confused with actual being. Whereas the other considers intention a actual and literal state of being, giving rise to and enforcing the illusion of a perpetual set of actions, such as in the case of the act of a perpetual movement forward. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably, as the actual important difference. So impractically practical is the difference between the two, that in a proven fact it has taken me eleven days to grasp the one most powerful difference regarding the two, from the initial start of the writing itself, and the difference involves protest, protesting, a difference which has given rise to a whole religious structure, and consequently a way of living in the form of protestantism, formulating the very actual civilisations form as it stands, in a supposedly logical cooperation. One will use protest in order to protest against freedom itself, with the aim of achieving freedom. Whereas the other will never even think it to be possible, where an instance of free existence, requires any type of protest in order to achieve it, simply by and off the prior existence of the other. Making one see available and possible division in everything, consequently invoke, initiate, develop, maintain, enact, hold as memory, incite, and plant such available and possible division at a beneficial advantage or disadvantage, at any given available and possible moment. Whereas making the other see available and possible division only if and when faced with at a standing, any standing, even then ignoring it at the earliest possibility available, unless and only unless, one is set to purposely meet face on, such available and possible division. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. Making barbarism and civilization reach an impossible impasse, with either part standing unchangeable. Throughout this writing, letter by letter it can be read, and clearly seen that no question is presented, proposed or posed in any possible form, yet on equal terms, letter by letter it can be read and clearly be seen that a completely different level and degree of what are understood as questions is the writing interwoven with and within, so much so, that the very thought of presenting, proposing or posing a question, any question nullifies the very thought. Most importantly, the writing refers to one and one, or one and the other, yet if and when undertaken as a reading, it is impossible to know which is, with the caveat of in almost all instances, as a repeating loop, being only one point of reference, be it in the form of a human being, consciousness or any other system the very process can be abstractly or realistically applied to. Only reading these two last paragraphs, one will either lean towards the civilization structure or lean towards the barbaric structure within their very own self, with either case justifiably held as a standing, often almost always picking one or more answers to none existing questions, more importantly, completely unaware of the answers being that which each is, instead as that which each is not, a reality. © MIRI MAY 16/2024

Part two AS FAR AND IN REGARDS TO IT, ALL OF IT, WHATEVER ALL OR IT IS WITHIN EXISTENCE, A QUESTION FORMAT STRUCTURE IS USED ONLY TO FIND OUT THAT WHICH CAN NEVER BE KNOWN MEANING IN VERY PRACTICAL TERMS ABSOLUTE NOTHING. THIS IS THE VERY STRUCTURE OF A QUESTION AND IT'S ULTIMATE BEST USE OF. ANY OTHER POSSIBLE USES ARE AND IS TO BE CONSIDERED A LOW, VERY LOW, ALL THE WAY TO EXTREMELY LOW LEVEL OF LOGIC. One will invoke the name of God other than the name of a God, refering, thinking, often visualising intentionally or unintentionally, a, or few very specific physical places, structures, forms, or even literal physical points of reference, as the possible, all the way to the precise origins of the name. One, other than the very word itself, even if and when attempting to do so, will not be able to. As a consequence one can never be a hero, although a, or any possible combinations of the most heroic actions have or could have been undertaken. Whereas one will always be a hero, although no evidence of a, or any combinations of the most heroic actions have or could have ever been undertaken let alone witnessed. The simple breathing of one, strengthens the very fabric of consciousness. The simple breathing of the other, challenges and disrupts the very fabric of consciousness. The horrifying efficiency of one, and the arguably efficiency of the other, without the horrifying part as a distinctive difference, is well documented throughout history as a very general specific set of linear and sometimes none linear set of actions, each equally destructive. One, having convinced or lied about convincing themselves first and foremost, as to who is the devil's, what are the devil's, how are the devil's and most importantly where are the devil's, will proceed in convincing as many others as possible on equal terms, offering the solution as to how to deal with the devil's, often involving a gradual all the way to quick build up progression in training, hate, applicable violence, tactics and arms, for the purpose of going as decreed by and of the holy or simply the just, to cleanse the place or sort it from the devil's. In doing so, one will in most cases be very horrifyingly efficient, until the designated devils of no fault of their own, will equally do the same, reversing the whole structure forced upon themselves, using the same method of designating the attackers as devil's also, which must be dealt with. At such a point the one which was very sure as to who, what, how and where are the devil's will suddenly or consequently gradually find their asurities seriously undermined by and off a not doubtful at all but very real physical existence. Making such one give up on their fruitful devilish endeavours, having manifested a lot of its horrifying efficiency in the process, until the next campaign attempt on the next devil's. Whereas one under such circumstantial constraints, will always treat anything and anyone including themselves as a problem without any negatives or positives attached to it, and in being a problem, having a solution, and in having a solution, such solution if and when a actual solution, should match to the exact or as humanly close as possible physical reality, the very standing reality, including it's very opposite. If and when devil's exist, such structures will love one, and hate the other, simple because one makes it impossible to recognise one while literally being one, and the other takes the devil part away from itself as a structure, making it irrelevant to existence. Strolling upon such steps one will always find and insist upon freedom as fundamental to existence. Whereas the other will find and insist upon freedom only relative to existence. Consequently to that, one will always be drawn, develop and live within the most magnificent and most highly complex forms of civilisation. Whereas the other will always be drawn, develop and live within the most magnificent and most highly complex forms of barbarism. With either part claiming the exact same structure. Apart in one being within the fundamental to existing freedom camp and backing it with a civilisation structure in order to naturally stand, and one being within the relative to existing freedom camp and backing it with a barbaric structure in order to stand.... Then it goes without saying, one will always insist in applying capital punishment in general terms and applicability, as justifiable. Whereas one will always refuse in any such insisting applications of capital punishment in general terms, as justifiable. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. Which clearly makes one civilisation and one barbarism on equal incouncilable magnificent terms. © MIRI MAY 16/2024

Part one AS FAR AND IN REGARDS TO IT, ALL OF IT, WHATEVER ALL OR IT IS WITHIN EXISTENCE, A QUESTION FORMAT STRUCTURE IS USED ONLY TO FIND OUT THAT WHICH CAN NEVER BE KNOWN MEANING IN VERY PRACTICAL TERMS ABSOLUTE NOTHING. THIS IS THE VERY STRUCTURE OF A QUESTION AND IT'S ULTIMATE BEST USE OF. ANY OTHER POSSIBLE USES ARE AND IS TO BE CONSIDERED A LOW, VERY LOW, ALL THE WAY TO EXTREMELY LOW LEVEL OF LOGIC. I really dislike conservatives, I have finally completed a full round up circle of dislike in regards to conservatives, or any symptoms of thoughts matching such as conservative. I do so being a conservative myself, even if and when I were to be one only as a consequence of heritage, which is also true, I would most certainly dislike all conservatives. Because a true conservative dislikes everything including and especially first and foremost all the conservatives to very begin with. I dislike conservatives because conservatives with and within almost all of the cases are stupid, and in finding myself under such circumstances as the one of being stupid very often, and having developed an awareness and consciousness about it, I prefer not to be stupid. The level of stupidity is so powerful under a conservative structure, that if and when faced with, is often horrifying, making conservatives very efficient at being horrifying, and arguably impossible to deal with, or have a productive conversation, hence predominantly stupid. Here is an example of the difference between the two, a conservative and a conservative. Constantine, in more or less all possible ways and methods said, and as a consequence physically stated, (Christianity is of Rome.) Justinian, in more or less all possible ways and methods said, and as consequence physically stated, (Rome is of Christianity). One is stupid and extremely efficient in being horrifying. The other is not stupid and arguably efficient without the horrifying part. Another difference as an example regards to the fact or a fact in being right. A conservative, in almost all cases will think let alone believe, being right, regards not to being right, but simply being in the right. A conservative, in almost all cases will believe let alone think, being right, regards not to being in the right, but simply being right. One is stupid and extremely efficient in being horrifying. The other is not stupid and arguably efficient without the horrifying part. One has to code a concept such as morals. One has to decode a concept such as morals. As sequential consequence.... Of one having to code, and one having to decode..... One will confuse almost completely and within most cases the state of being in the right with the state of being right. One will in almost all cases refuse a state of being in the right, to always remain as a definite categorical state of being right. One is stupid and extremely efficient in being horrifying. The other one is not stupid and arguably efficient without the horrifying part. Under such light pointed at any spot, an extremely powerful and most complex in subtlety possible subtle difference is visualised, and it is precisely because of its powerful subtle structure, the difference is used as anything but that. One will state (my place my rules) type of linguistic structural sentence as a logical, highly moral in a right standing, consequently justifiable through aggression or even a violence manifestable. One will state if and when, the exact same type of linguistic structural sentence of (my place my rules) only as a real physical obviositie, without any logic, any type of highly, neither moral, right, or even any standing, and most definitely attaching no type of aggression, violence or justifiability, with a crucial caveat of the if and when part, extremely rare in occurrence, preferably never, on a given life circle at minimum. One is stupid and extremely efficient in being horrifying. The other is not stupid and arguably efficient without the horrifying part. One is within a billions count and I find myself mainly part of. One is very rare in count and I want to be part of. The differences increase and consequently making the establishment of one within billions count and one within a rare count simply because.. One will use coding to decode the, or that very coding used initially. Whereas one will only use decoding always, emphasising it's heirarchical advantage and reality, in being above any other code. As a consequence one can only replicate, and at extremely high levels and degrees of complexity, efficiency, including at the highest levels of intricacies one it is faced with. Whereas one, on top of the replicate ability, can also make and invent, as a consequence of the ability of decoding being a literal invention, giving one the ample possibilities of rearrangement. © MIRI MAY 16/2024

DARPA is deep involved in the development of the Supersoldier for the SSP Programs. This secret program is running from the 1960 - 1970 years and later.

Because of darpa we have gps?? ( what about this dude Nikola T.?)😊

5:11 Houthis, Iran...2024 April

Talk of war will bring war. Talk of peace will bring Peace All in All it will Past

Part two The question in relation to humanity should be...! Does innovation (which can be used by human beings in a infinite always unknown universe) flourishes better independently or through a probabilistics statistical run? If and when a system, any system that works and fails simultaneously in the most perfect and mundane way with and within extremely large numbers as indicated and individuated targets simultaneously, intentionally or unintentionally, knowingly or unknowingly, that system is involved in a continuous probabilistics statistical run, (if and when operating), be such a system anything from education, health, media entertainment all the way to any state government structure. Such a method has two main features as purpose, one is intended the other unintended, meaning one is wanted and always desired, while the other one is not, in fact enormous work goes into the unwanted feature so that it can be avoided. Both main features and their consequential purpose have no choice, no other way as a choice but to be dealt in the same manner of the other, as it is the only manner each is manifested as a wanted and desired main feature or a unwanted and aimed to be avoided main feature. I say there is no other choice, because the method of operating is all of the freedom and the limit itself as a method simply be being one of a probabilistics statistical run, which as a method can and only can always work by (burning) any and all set/set's of data through running statistical probabilities with and within, over and over, any and all set/set's of data it uses, as a method with and within any system. If and when the data it uses is in fact emotions, memories, dreams, desires, talent, crime, aspirations, entertainment, abilities, hope, despair, anger, resistance, faith and beliefs, senses, just weights, methods of organising, methods of exchange etc, which as a primary target are and can always be with and within any human being (but not necessarily so) together with any physical location which will always include, height, weight, width, speed, colour, form/shape and symmetry, from the actual human body itself all the way to any architectural or natural design, ((((then a system operating in such manner will and can churn up and down, in and out)))) all the elders, the wise, the leaders, the close circle of confidence, the friends, the art, the talent, the universal and personal family, the democracy square, the just weights, the independent impartial from ourselves means of thought, the universal and personal holy post office, for anyone, anywhere and at any period (through burning all the available data in a probabilistics statistical run over and over, with and within) most likely at the exact same measure of working and failing simultaneously in the most perfect or mundane way needed, regarding anyone, anywhere and at any period, and this is exactly the main feature as purpose that is (highly) desired and wanted in operating such a system. The other primary unwanted feature, which enormous work and effort is involved in avoiding it, (not so funny enough in this case) is exactly the same thing, with the same outcome as the wanted and desired main feature and purpose, which is the real actual burning of all available and possible data through running it over and over, with and within as a probabilistics statistical run, with a huge (tiny) difference, that of having no control over such a process, an absolute no control whatsoever and not because it is impossible or as [pointed] out not desired, but instead because (and this is the funny enough bit), a probabilistics statistical run, any, works only in such a way, which is by burning all the available and possible data, together with the wanted, desired and the unwanted, undesired main features as a total purpose eventually. This method is used in physics and mathematics in order of creating a functional and tested true map for advancing forward or in any possible directions with and within a what cannot be avoided, infinite and always unknown universe, it is not used if and when a functional and tested true map is available as it is a waste of being and the being, it can be taken up if and when the functional and tested true map does not match (work) with and within a infinite and always unknown universe, but only in the case of when and if anyone is at such a always unknown point of a infinite universe especially as a way of thinking. When this method is used for actual human beings as a target and location be that with single or plural numbers, then a question of ...! When and how is the first wanted and desired main feature as a purpose ignored or not, and when and how is the second unwanted and undesired main feature as a purpose ignored or not? Most importantly...!?! Are the people operating such a system in relation to actual human beings aware of what the system is, how and why it works in such a way? And a final more specifically targeted question should be in the connection of.... Why and how does the being as human by anyone, anywhere and at any period, puts in question, doubt or worst make entirely irrelevant all the probabilistics statistical run the very being anyone is as, is constantly doing since eternity? (((( The term, burn out all the available and possible data in connection to human beings, refers to the actual hijacking (meaning the substitution) of any and all possible points of reference used to establish being human by anyone, as a consequence of that any understanding or knowledge of being human, and as a consequence of that, the human being self by running out any and all being human simply as a mass of matter that has a (a) start and a (b) end.)))) Why bother to highlight this in such a way? Because when and if considering that there has been give or take around two hundred years of what is recognised as epistemology then.... Let's just say that proving any form of being, independently, will (be) extreme hard, if not, in and with many cases impossible. © Miri 28 May /2023 1:22

Part one Good morning! Good morning. How are you today.....!? I am ok, the usual, work, credit cards, insurances, health plans, pension plans, family, pains and aches and all the other states. How about you, how are you today..!? I am ok, the usual also, minus the work, credit cards, insurances, health plans, pension plans, family, I am making up with extra pains and aches and all other new states, such as insecurity, uncertainty, doubt, disorientation, out of focus, and healthy increase of good old fashion (there is no hope) type of aspirations. Well that is life! Yes and life is a .... Hahahaha....... No don't laugh, I really mean it, that is what our elders, the wise, the leaders, our close circle of confidence, our friends, our talent, our comedians and artists, our universal family, our democracy square, our justice balance, our independent impartial from ourselves means of thought, our universal holy post office etc etc said today. What did yours say..!?! Similar stuff but from a different point of view, a point of view relative to our circle of confidence, our friends, our talent, our comedians and artists, our universal family, our democracy square, our justice balance, our independent impartial from ourselves means of thought, our universal holy post office etc etc, plus it said that conflict has and continues to moved sporadically depending on the (order and the period) from point (a) to point (b), and from point b to point k etc etc in a type of crisis behaviour, with a possibility of an increase onto some type of war, or a decrease with some piece type of peace. That is a lie.. No way, what you said is a lie. Impossible...we always aim to be on the right side of history. Which is our side of history. If it was left up to your side we would not have any freedoms let alone history. Freedoms that your side is taking away from our side. That is a lie .. It is not, and you are lying by saying that.......etc etc This is a possible scenario as a day to day conversation (at various levels of inclusion regarding the information) between anyone as family, friends, colleagues, relationships, neighbours all the way to strangers in some form of contact at all possible cultural settings and at any possible location as a setting, and it is precisely this possible type of scenario, which is the main foundational structure as to why, (all that is understood and recognised as news, political analysis, entertainment, popular documentaries, learning, teaching, advertisment all the way to governmental information of the modern period, transmitted, utilised and absorbed through what is known as information, digital, and media technology, by anyone anywhere and at any period)....works and fails simultaneously in the most perfect or mundane way. This ....(it) can only achieve such structural status by having and continuously aiming to hijack (meaning substitute) all and any points of reference related to confidence, trust, anger, honour, measure and sense of justice, satisfaction, desire, aspiration, information, gossip/chit chat, humour, tragedy, hope, acceptance in relation to reality (meaning science, philosophy and religion), including the most important as a consequence of all, (skills, talent and the art) in relation to all and any possible fields from education to health (meaning life and death), which are, have and should always be as a (primary) degree of order with and within the smallest circles of human existence as points of reference to begin with, that include an increasing or decreasing method from what is considered family by anyone (meaning even their very own self to start with) all the way to a country, often going through a larger relations family, friends, neighborhood, village, town, city, area, country, including school system, work, political ideology, religion, philosophy and science. In having managed to hijack (meaning substitute), most importantly continuing to do so the order and most of the points of reference related to confidence, trust, anger, honour, measure and sense of justice, satisfaction, desire, aspiration, information, gossip/chit chat, humour, tragedy, hope, acceptance in relation to reality (meaning science, philosophy and religion), including the most important as a consequence of all, (skills, talent and the art) in relation to all and any possible fields from education to health (meaning life and death), for anyone, anywhere and at any period....!?! Which are, have and should always be as a (primary) degree of order with and within the smallest circles of human existence as points of reference to begin with towards an increase only if and when necessary....!?!! Then a structural status where any system works and fails simultaneously in the most perfect or mundane way is the mode of operation. A mode of operation that is a highly effective method of sorting, any possible combinations of numbers type, and any possible combinations of sorting. There is nothing wrong with such a mode of operation if and when applicable in any field, actually it is a very useful and successful method. © Miri 28 May /2023 1:22

Elon Musk is DARPA operative. Once Neuralink is mainstream, it's checkmate. Imagine linking all thoughts to the net, simultaneously. As he states before, it's a matter of bandwidth. Once humans are connected to the net through the neural network, AI will reach singularity. I'm reminded of an old movie, Lawnmower Man.

Oxytocin is what's behind mega churches. Take Joel Osteen for example. He'll always, always, always begin his sermons with "something funny". This is to calm the audience, capture their attention, and it also releases oxytocin from the brain. Oxytocin is dubbed the bonding hormone.

They're at least 100 years into the future technology wise. Computer processing power always doubles and then is sold to the peasants rendering the old gen obsolete. This ensures cash flow for the manufacturer. These guys however have increased computing power exponentially. Project Looking Glass......

Boy Damm I think we really need to concentrate on our thinking prudents

Yah who r u miss chicken box nacwell from edo Stewart's big time mall?

51:00 I have a answer to that question: Look for LifeLog by Darpa, then check why its bein ''stop'' and the date, after look when Facebook came in...... Zuckerberg story bcm a fairy tail after loll

So... just checking in middle of 2024... it's gotten pretty bad, surprise? 😴

Because you are a govt mouthpiece. The only way you are able to continue talking.

Not been taken by surprise since Sputnik, but I ask, what of Iran sucking one of our drones outta the sky , unblemished. At least that's what we heard anyway.

the most annoying moderator, desperate he can't get something bad out of it

Two smart people, surprisingly did not produce a very interesting discussion. Probably because it's in California, where great ideas go to die.

Skynet

I wonder if that’s why they don’t brain scan our brains when it comes to mental health and see other medications are firing off in our head. Because if they want to implant a chip in my head yet, they don’t want to do a brain scan on my head to check my mental health.

Makes me sick to think about people trying to come up with ways destroy each other if that’s not evil I don’t know what is

Rewriting the future with Annie Jacobsen

Bring the Pain

"She speaks so well!" She speaks so well!" = Chris Rock

If darpa is so good, how come they can't stop people from hacking systems

Reason why ??? This UFOS are paper thin They barely have the

Darpa told us all what the treatment for covid is, before covid broke out

😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

Interesting how this was 9 years ago and now we're seeing drone warfare in Ukraine/Russia.

Her voice...❤

The American people get a 1/3 of their pay taken from them to fund projects that have NO BENEFIT to them. These science projects are being used subjugation, On us, and people from other countries.

Trans humanism probably already exists. We won’t know know what they’re doing now for another 10-15 years

If they could control a moth remotely in 1988 imagine what they could do now. I think they are definitely controlling humans through the internet / social media

Once again like apollo, continuation of nazi idea...this time of wunder waffe program.

This puts Eisenhower's speech into a better context. It explains why then and now, we are constantly involved in wars around the world, either directly or by proxy. The Defense Department cannot sit on weapons that might become obsolete. They must be used up, plus the money is to vast. Also, remember that John F Kennedy wanted to pull us out of Vietnam and break apart the CIA and these other institutions that support the military industrial complex. We all know how that ended.

Welp. So much for trust after Covid.

Alert and knowledgeable citizentry😂 With all the censorship?

Are there ANY patriots left in the Pentagon? Did Obama purge the ranks of American patriots?

😊😊😊😊😊🎉🎉🎉

😊😊😊😊😊😊

😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

Bill Gates got more money from Reagan than Darpa and zucurburg got even more money than the NSA but its only because of political communist interests